Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)
by
DooMAD
on 12/01/2016, 17:22:45 UTC
Mostly it's just amusing that people around here like to think of themselves as crypto-anarchists, but only until someone disagrees.  Then they swiftly turn into crypto-fascists and start whining about "contentious issues" that shouldn't be discussed and attempting to justify stifling debate about it and calling people "shills".  You're about as anarchistic as the average teenager, but with slightly less of a spine.   Roll Eyes
That's a premature assumption you're making. Obviously it should be discussed, and is being discussed. The point is the observation that one side, or at least the most visible posters of one side, amazingly do not accept new input at all, and just keep reiterating the same false arguments ad nauseum.

Are you operating under the assumption that the "bad guys" are sitting idly by while decentralization undoes their millennia-old consolidation of centralized control over resources? Or do you not even believe there are any "bad guys" and that everything is as the MSM says?


Yes, it's being discussed despite the best efforts of some to prevent it.  There's nothing premature whatsoever about my statement.  There is a clear and concerted effort being made to sweep certain ideas under the carpet as they're somehow perceived as dangerous to the status quo.  And people on both sides are repeating disproven and dishonest arguments.  There are still people referring to alternative clients as altcoins when this is fundamentally misleading, or insinuating that releasing a client that proposes a change to the protocol is tantamount to an act of sedition.  This is entirely at odds with an open source project where anyone is free to modify the code as they please.  It's also unfounded to claim that anyone who disagrees with your view must somehow be brainwashed by the mainstream media.