I doubt it.

New investors are not interested in what happened two years ago at launch. They have their own priorities which may be anything from purchasing a web service to earning a return on a holding. Nor do I agree with you that it was "fraudulent". You would not have made that claim if X-Coin or whatever it was at the time collapsed and disappeared into oblivion and the fact that it didn't has nothing to do with the instamine.

On bitcointalk, everyone makes up their definitions as they go along to suit their own particular agenda and "fraud" is a word that is banded about with great liberty. If you really think it's fraudulent - in the sense that assets were stolen - then I think people should either make a court case out of it or stfu because there are plenty of "real" frauds going on that truly warrant the term.