Where did you read that segwit is to be included? That would be very unlikely.
That is where the votes are -
https://bitcoinclassic.consider.it/ and 2 of 3 devs are in favor of a hardfork segwit on bitcoin classic.. so it will likely be included. If it isn't included we should definitely avoid Bitcoin classic as SegWit does some amazing things beyond 1.75 capacity.
...you should wait for more people/players to vote to get better idea of result.... but let see later...
Well that was my originally position. To withhold judgment until an actual proposal is made and code released. You than suggested it was clear which isn't the case as the Bitcoin classic group is still formulating a proposal. It is quite scary we have people Ack'ing a "non-proposal" as well... why aren't people being reasonable and waiting to see what is being proposed before agreeing to it? Additionally, why are people attacking "it" when there is nothing to attack except personalities. People should judge the proposal or BIP on its technical merits and not on the people who develop it , because after all this is open source and one good idea can be copied by all.