Based on hype, and unfounded hype at that. What 3rd party developers? Look into it closely. It's smoke and mirrors. There's really nothing under the hood. And it's not like they hide it either: it's all right there in their own documentation for the whole world to freely see. Technically, they're even worse off than BTC, and developmentally worse yet; you almost get the idea they're laughing in everyone's face.

My prediction is that they are going to give new meaning to the word bagholder. But don't take my word for it, look into it closely . . . don't forget to read all the different threads on them while you're at it, and please advise if you find a positive community thread somewhere other than their own sock puppet laiden forum or reddit, 'cause I've yet to find anything positive there either.

If I had Ethereum, I'd sell it now.

ADD: Please duly note that these are my thoughts being expressed to our community members both as strong opinion and a healthy challenge to really start comparing apples with apples and oranges with oranges, and that means in this case cryptographic digital currency basics with cryptographic digital currency basics. I am not on another coin's thread bashing it. I'm here saying they don't hold a candle to us. Big difference. On top of that, my last newsletter clearly laid out 4 of the most basic cryptographic digital currency fundamentals to compare with, so, if you want to really compare, you know right where to go for a head start. Prove me wrong.

And don't worry, I will be proving my point anyway. It's only a matter of time until I fully document my top 10 shams.