Anonymity != fungibility. They are not reliant on each other. They have some minor overlap but not really. This argument is just mostly delusional bullshit.
I already went through this with you so I won't re-rehearse those arguments here ad-nauseum. Suffice to say that to someone who makes up their definitions as they go along to suit their argument, it doesn't surprise me that everything else looks like "delusional bullshit".
There is no transparency when a transaction on the block chain has mixing inputs and outputs. More bullshit.
It is not "more bullshit", otherwise cryptographic obfuscation technologies wouldn't go to the lengths they do to limit their end user's ability to
verify their transaction movements on public block explorers.
Apart from that you haven't even understood or questioned what aspect of "transparency" I'm alluding to - again that doesn't surprise me since you seem happy to make baseless assumptions about everything else in order to fuel your rambling diatribe and field well made arguments with all the grace of throwing your toys out of the pram.