I applaud your bravery debunking the forkers wannabes, yet you still cling on to the idea taht the blocksize should be raised to fix the scaling non-issue.
Bitcoin is not meant to scale on the protocol level because it will foster centralization and introduce attack vectors.
Why do you think so? The most easiest change would be a block size increase
which might not be safe right now (depending on the size), but it certainly is going to be safe
someday. e.g. 10 MB blocks
might not be safe today, but with the
development of technology it might be safe in 5 years (random numbers). This does not introduce attack vectors;
scaling based on speculation (BIP 101 and XT) is dangerous though.
Think twice before posting such contradictory out of gavin's ass sorta hypothetical nonsense.
PS: Moore is dead.