Don't know. But I don't think this to be suspicous. Maybe they are enhencing the voting-mechanism? maybe they want to get more people on board before releasing the code? We'll see.
They're planning something.
Perhaps no code is needed because they prefer to reconcile with Core as the differences between both implementations are so small that all they need to accomplish is get enough consensus to bring Core around to the idea of a hardfork in 2016?
Consensus is soon, I just wish there were more details as to what Bitcoin Classic represents as I cannot give my opinion on the matters until there is.
My best guess is that it is a 2 -4 plan with Segwit hardforked???
https://bitcoinclassic.consider.it/merge-3-v0112-2mb-4mb?results=trueMiners supporting Classic
Bitmain/Antpool - 27%
BitFury - 13%
BW.COM - 4%
HAOBTC.com -
KnCMiner - 5%
Genesis Mining
= over 49%
Companies supporting Classic
Coinbase
OKCoin
Bitstamp
Foldapp
Bitcoin.com
Bread Wallet
Snapcard.io
Cubits
Developers
Jonathan Toomim
Gavin Andresen
Ahmed Bodiwala
Jeff Garzik
Peter Rizun
Hopefully there will be some reconciliation between Core and Classic and the can find consensus together as there is a lot of support and talent within both groups.