Has anyone with high technical knowledge taken the time to deconstruct his post point-by-point? He does make some interesting points that even I (not by any means a "big blockist") feel should be addressed.
Pick out a few of the more interesting bits and I'll respond to them.
Why would Satoshi not sign his post, thus proving that it really is him? Surely that would be a big blow to the ph0rkers, no?
- Satoshi never signed his posts.
- He likely wouldn't want it to look like he was dictating Bitcoin's future.