Hearn and Gavin want Bitcon to scale on the main chain,
which is a no-brainer good idea.
Yes. But Gavin is trying to predict what the network will look like 20 years down the road. While forking is actually a healthy activity that should probably be done every few years. If you can accept that logic, then BIP101 is ridiculous.
Conservatism is the best approach. We should decide between 2MB or 4MB blocks and fork again down the road as needed. All this bitcoinclassic constitution nonsense is yet another distraction that is going to create more division and more delay.
Yes we SHOULD decide but who is WE?
Knock knock...hello... Don't you get it?
Bitcoin core/Blockstream/Maxwellhouse Koolaid refuses to raise it. Are you going to sit and wait for Godot?
The only way to raise it is have another repository like Bitcoin Classic.