I'd like to know a lot more about how the NYTimes journalist, Nathaniel Popper who wrote the Digital Gold fiction, was able to time the release of his Hearn hit piece exactly for R3C's benefit at the washington hearing?

Also the tenor of Popper's article is way overstating Hearn's importance to bitcoin, historically and recently and he is almost certain to know he is doing this after his research into the specific area of personalities involved in bitcoin for his Digital Gold book. So he has proved to be a nasty little propaganda tool who should be watched closely ... as closely as he spies on us I guess.