Maybe you missed that highlighted bit. You are giving me a list of those in involved in creating the approach, and attempt to pass it off as a list of those who support it.
So let's take the development away from a group with several years of experience and assign it to people with much less experience or none? In what world does that make sense?
I dont think that was the point we were making.
But as you mention it, it is an open source project. Anyone can make a contribution and if it passes review it can be accepted. Are you saying that the *only* talented developers in the world work with core? That is utter cock. There are plenty of talented developers who can get involved.
But its a moot point - most of the good contributors would continue with whatever gained consensus. Unless they felt the politics is more important than the code. In which case they are welcome to leave.