atheists do not hate religion, they choose not to be a part of an organized idea that has few leeway and seems absolute even thou common sense sometimes trumps their ideas.
What's the matter? Don't tell me that you can't think clearly enough to understand that science proves the existence of God, and that my explanations of it in
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg13596139#msg13596139 and
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg13596385#msg13596385 are beyond your understanding.
Of course, if the things in the links are the truth - and you can't understand this stuff - how can you even make an honest suggestion common sense is against something that is proven? In this case you are borderline goofy.

So you claim to 'scientifically' prove the existence of god, why don't you put this up for peer review?
Moreover, lets see you prove that Zeus is not the only one true god.
If I claim anything about this, the facts of the science claim it a whole lot more.
Peer review is a waste of time. Most scientists don't WANT to hear it. The ones that do want to hear it, can't speak for fear of losing their jobs - politics of science lies. However, science has understood what I have shown for a long time, now.
Review it yourself rather than simply talking about me. It isn't that difficult... especially for someone who has the ability to post in a forum.
