Re: "Bitcoin Classic" is a classic attempt at a hostile takeover
who owns bitcoin? who are "they" gonna take something over from? instead of throwing around buzzwords like "hostile takeover", why don't you try to explain what exactly is so bad about the proposed changes?
I guess we are yet to see what will occur - but currently my concern is that the "Classic" group are trying to replace the "Core" group.
If a "merger" were to happen then maybe that would be the best outcome.
core group replaced themselves when they joined the "blockstream" group. and then set their own agenda..
and to be honest it doesnt matter what the politics of the groups are, i dont care about the politics of gavincoin or blockstream coin.. when looking at sourcecode.. as long as the code of their implementations are clean, and the implementation "does exactly whats said on the tin".. then the social drama is meaningless..
i would prefer an implementation where there is a selection box for the user to decide what settings to allow, what rules to increase. that way they dont have to argue about which brand or social group to trust.. the user can just change it himself without going two flying F*cks about who made it
EG
