Obviously Bitcoin presents an overlap of technology and socioeconomics.
My point was that I (and many others) aren't willing to follow a group
of developers simply because they are experienced technicians.

I think Mike Hearn pointed out some of the key philosophical/technical
points held by Greg Maxwell.  Greg is obviously bright, but
based on everything I've heard from equally smart people
such as Gavin Andressen and Peter Rizun, I've
decided that I also disagree with Greg Maxwell's position and vision
for what Bitcoin should be and how to scale it.

As someone pointed out in a recent thread "people are not satifisfied
with Core's scalability roadmap".

You can disagree; I'm not here to try to change your opinion.  I'm
simply telling you mine.