I understand the frustration of losing so much time defending points. I suffer the same frustration and sometimes lash out because of it. You have real school work to do, and I should instead be coding than commenting here. Unfortunately there is nothing that can be done about this. Each of us makes a decision to post or not post.

Smooth and I (and some others) are deep into this shit already and hard to get us to do something else. You should not let your school work suffer for this. We experts are not going to totally screw up crypto land. I am for one a counter balancing force to pretty much everything else out there. Have some faith, relax, and pick your priority points to make once in a while, to help advance crypto while not letting your education suffer since that is so important for your future.

I understand you feel we are giving a one-sided view of Bitshares, but I have explained my side of that in the Decentralization thread and also in a short exchange with Stan Larimer. Daniel is always pitching some new gimick which doesn't make any sense to me at all. I think his market clearing ideas are nonsense. I think his latest blog post about making a PoS that does work is also complete nonsense. I have already explained some of my reasons but tersely in some cases. I don't have the time to detail all my thinking on that to the point where I can convince every diehard Bitshares fan to understand my logic entirely. I don't expect anything worthy to come from Daniel, because he always has some gimick that is the antithesis of decentralization and/or which doesn't scale in the real world.


The world is not going to adopt a coin that is a corporation. Period.

Same for that shit OBITS.