Re: "Bitcoin Classic" is a classic attempt at a hostile takeover
Gentle reminder: you (and other "1mb for life" supporters) are the one who wants to turn Bitcoin into something it wasn't originally meant to be. There's nothing wrong with it, but lets not pretend it's otherwise.
Gentle reminder2: When the XT kicked in, the core devs pretty much agreed that block size should be lifted at some point, they just wanted more time and less aggressive change. The proposed 2mb is very conservative, so lets see how it unfolds.
Gentle reminder2: When the XT kicked in, the core devs pretty much agreed that block size should be lifted at some point, they just wanted more time and less aggressive change. The proposed 2mb is very conservative, so lets see how it unfolds.
Please don't "talk down to people" with such stupid things as "gentle reminders" (it just makes you look bad really).
If you want to be taken seriously then such condescending comments don't help.
For the record: I actually have never stated that I think the block size should remain "1MB for life" so in fact you are just putting words into my mouth (mostly I have just questioned the "sense of urgency" for bigger blocks that is being used by Gavin and others vying for control of the project).
(Gentle reminder: Don't make up crap about what other people have said or supposedly support in order to suit your own arguments.)
