Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)
by
BitUsher
on 20/01/2016, 04:17:55 UTC


In the statement above you are supporting the conspiracy theory that Core is delibretely and secretly stalling.

I don't know how secret it is, but yes I believe they intend to delay increases in blocksize for
as long as they can and minimize their magnitude.  It's no secret that Greg Maxwell has
been against increasing the blocksize, at least any time soon.

I believe keeping the blocksize limit fits with their business model.
Blockstream has funded development of LN, and
obviously they need to create profits somewhere.

Sorry BitUsher, but I don't see that I've been misinformed about anything.  

I know you believe that I'm not seeing things clearly.
And I in turn, believe you are not seeing things clearly.
(Specifically, that we easily can and should increase main chain capacity now,
but that Blockstream doesn't want to do it for business reasons.)
 
Both sides of the debate have their opinions and biases
and both sides feel they have good reasons and are right.

I'm ok with others having a different opinion than me.


So you stand behind your statement ".and that the same guys in core (everyone
except Gavin and Garzik) who are against meaningful blocksize increases work
for a private company called Blockstream" as well ? How do you rationalize this lie?

(Specifically, that we easily can and should increase main chain capacity now,
but that Blockstream doesn't want to do it for business reasons.)

There you go again... deliberately misleading the general public ... you can't just help yourself can you?
To others reading : The reality is SegWit has the same effective capacity increase as Bitcoin classic and is on schedule
 and will likely be released sooner than Bitcoin classic.