Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)
Some are far more influential than others obviously. Why don't you add up the commits (excluding Gavin and garzik) and see how far off I was. Have fun 
We all know core won't do anything without "consensus" so it might as well be everyone as its most of the major voices.
We all know core won't do anything without "consensus" so it might as well be everyone as its most of the major voices.
Perhaps next time you can accurately qualify your statements from the start instead of making outright lies, and than have to back-peddle with multiple rationalizations and added caveats.... My cynicism is high with you as you are showing a lack of integrity to honestly admit you made a mistake and apologize for misleading the larger community.
Now you are suggesting , that those who contribute the most code and are the most productive work at blockstream.... I look forward to you spreading this narrative in the future.... somehow I doubt it will fit your agenda.
Yes, your cynicism is palpable. I agree.
I thought I just did "honestly admit" that I was speaking in general terms.
I really don't see any "lies" or "back peddling" or "rationalizations" or "caveats".
Why don't you pull out your thesaurus and see if you can paint an even darker
picture here?
What is the MAIN POINT, THE ESSENCE of what I'm saying?
People like Luke, Matt, Greg, and Pieter are major players in core and also are/were involved
with Blockstream. If you take away Jeff and Gavin, sure there are others who contribute
but they aren't very influential.
I admit, saying "everyone" was an innacuracy, and I'm more than happy to
admit that, but I haven't misled anyone (at least intentionally). Most people
know there are many contributors to the open source project.
That's was my point the whole time and I think you know this was my point,
and I think you know my point is valid.
I believe you are splitting hairs in an attempt to discredit me but
its not working. Go attack someone else.