So what percentage of mining was represented by the list mentioned in that tweet? Are you saying that the list represents "around 2/3rds of Chinese mining pools indicating they are sticking with core"? Sorry for being dense, but I want to be clear.
--------------Disclaimer ... This is the speculation thread, therefore any nods of approval miners are making to both core and classic don't hold much weight, any tacit support that classic has on their homepage doesn't hold much weight, any rumors could be untrue and have to individually be weighed, any decisions companies make can be changed at the last moment. The only vote that truley counts is when the economic majority and miners start switching over code and validating tx's and mining blocks with one implementation or another.
I was quite clear with my statement and will not leave Wang chun and F2Pool as neutral because I am familiar with the wider context and how he prefers to stick with core and already negotiated a deal for maxBlockSize to increase in 2017. Additionally, he believes that a 75% threshold is dangerous and believes all hardforks should be set to 95%.