I wasn't aware I was making an argument, merely an observation. As I said, I know nothing about Stephen Gornick's situation, and I have only vague memories of BitFloor losing a large stash of btc.
Isn't there some sort of moral imperative to make good?
Isn't there some sort of moral imperative to make good?
A "mere obersveration" in the form of pointed, leading questions?
You've now made two arguments, albeit using the Socratic method (*cough, passive aggression, cough*).
Here was the first one:
If Stephen Gornick has currency with you and now cannot access it, what does it matter if that currency was btc or fiat?