If we discover a real commerce activity, let me repeat: real commerce activity (not graphs that can be faked, or stress tests) overflowing to altcoins, then it's a valid moment to raise Bitcoin block size.
Until then, our fees gonna be cheap anyway, because you only have to pay more fee than spammers.
Since spammers are cheap asses, spammers are never going to pay a lot fees. For them it's waste of money.
Yes i have noticed, despite the scaremongering of huge fees, I still pay 0.0001
BTC and it works fine.
How about introducing a 1-1000 satoshi minimum TX fee, that would eliminate free transactions and reduce the attack vector from spammers?
Simple: Ver, Toomim, Hearn, Jeff Garzik are paid by N.Y Bankers, who try to overtake Bitcoin developement. But chinese miners seem to disagree.
There was always something fishy about it, i can detect propaganda easily, but with this one they almost had me fooled.
Thats why we should probably look at facts first and less about charisma and blindly following bitcoin celebrities.