If an individual payer wants to attempt a double-spend, he doesn't have enough PoW by himself to accomplish it.
This is plain nonsense. Of course an individual payer can have a majority of PoW, that's how double spends exist in the first place.
You entirely fail to comprehend what has been explained to you and that is also why you fail to understand why the math you have shown is irrelevant.
You only able to see things in a small box perspective and unable to contemplate how the holistic economics renders your thinking invalid.
Please try and be civil here, I am trying to help you.
You are not being civil because you are being boastful about your myopia and instead of trying to understand, you are trying to fill the thread up with noise. I told you my PM box is available and we can hash out your myopia there, so we don't have to play 21 cat & mouse questions here. We can come back here and point out the final conclusions. Or I asked you to create another thread to discuss your myopia but you refused and continued posting your noise in this thread. You are extremely disrespectful.
I told you I want to keep this thread terse and easy to follow.