You have repeatedly been stating that Zerocash does not need IP obfuscation and therefore is not subject to I2P/TOR, which are, in your opinion, flawed. However, it needs IP obfuscation for certain cases (see Zerocash whitepaper section 6.4) and will be using TOR for that ->
https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/689958030859960321. Thus, initially your statements were erroneous.
I already replied to that very specific issue upthread (and in Monero's technical thread) in my recent debate with smooth and explained why you are clueless. Try to actually read everything I wrote on an issue before making incorrect technical allegations (of the ad hominem kind against me) on that issue.
It won't help you Monero speculators to remain ignorant about the critical nuances of technical issues that you do not understand properly.
I am not going to repeat what I already wrote on that technical issue. Go find what I wrote. I am not going to open the Monero technical thread again and be incited to refute further discussion there. You all are entitled to think what you want to think.
I am merely pointing out that
initially you were wrong, because you stated Zerocash wouldn't need IP obfuscation at all, whereas they do need it (even though it might be for specific cases, like you stated in that thread (I actually read a bit of it)). Perhaps that doesn't render your initial statement erroneous in your eyes, in mine (and likely others) it does.
Ad hominem, please, this is getting ludicrous.