Observation: 'Usagi is unable to provide proper accounting.'
Again: learn to read. I didn't say usagi is unable to provide proper accounting. I said "... if usagi doesn't provide proper accounting".
Learn to read. I didn't say that it proves, but that it is reasonable to assume if usagi doesn't provide proper accounting.
The rest of your argument is unclear. Feel free to explain what your point is.
Nice strawman you made there though.
Exactly, augustocroppo, you may also want to read some more about
strawman and other logical fallacies while your at it.
Still, you did not presented any evidence as I have required. I am not interested in logical fallacies.
Whatever pretension you have, your assumption does not prove that Usagi is defrauding his investors.