Re: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors.

~~(...)~~
It's not hard to understand.

Cut off the chit-chat... I want to see the hard evidence. I am not interested in mere assumptions.

You are repeating the same question over and over again.

It's called an argumentum ad nauseam or argument by repetition
http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallacies/50-argument-by-repetition

I am not doing an argument. I asking a question: where is the evidence which proves that Usagi is not willing to comply with his obligations? Where are the shareholders claiming that Usagi defrauded them?