But then Sloanf overlays his own assumptions, gliding over the fact that they are in fact, just assumptions.
- No proof there is no model
Yet he was jailed for failing to give up his assets which included the model. Further, in the doco there are other programmers talking about working with the model, setting up traps & watching hackers intrude.
- No proof he didn't pay his team to spend a year in London Museum analysing historical data back to Greco - Roman times.
End of the day, if you don't agree with MA's stuff, don't read it.
Its not me who should prove whether the model exists or not, ok. Its MA who should prove it to everybody because he makes claims and sell his stuff at exorbitant prices based on those claims. The same goes with the data and everything else. Based on the facts available in public assess I made a conclusion that he does not have the super-computer, nor capital flow model, nor data (at least not in the form he claims) and shared this conclusion with you. If you dont agree, then bring facts that prove the opposite. Otherwise, its just your biased view.