Didn't seem that great to me.  (the spoon/fork comment was apropos).

He started with a false premise about the "block maximalists" and what their motives are.
I already stated my own opinions about what "big blockers" really want,
and that was the counter argument.

The 'cracking under pressure' was a tangential remark, not my argument,
you knucklehead.  

Half joking anyway about 'cracking' but his recent post history has been uncharacteristic.