But do you know what they are for and why they're completely irrelevant to this debate? Are you just writing stuff to shut us up?
They are relevant and no I'm not. I'd like proper feedback. If someone wants to deploy multiple nodes and doesn't have a big budget aren't PI's and similar computers their best option? Regardless, I'm asking where the cut-off point is? What 'minimum sys. requirements' should full nodes have?
mmkey, let's see if I can clarify:
You guys obviously have no clue as to what an 'example' is. I could care less about the Raspberry PI, but I know a lot of people using those to either mine or run nodes.
Sure. I have literally hundreds of Raspberrys and Beagle Boards in my
mine. But do you know what they are for and why they're completely irrelevant to this debate? Are you just writing stuff to shut us up?
The Beagles and the RaspBs in mines are used to control ASICs, they run CGminer and receive and send work to the server/pool. Anyone using it in a way that's touching the blockchain directly is doing it wrong.
And you seem to think everyone should run a full node. In the name of decentralization.
Wrong conclusions. I think that anyone who wishes to run a full node should be able to do so relatively inexpensively (e.g. not costing the user a fortune) and easily (setting up). I do not think that more people should be pushed into SPV wallets because of some limitation in their region (internet as an example). They should be allowed to choose.
You are probably going to improperly understand this again. I do not mean that I'm against 2 MB blocks. I've been actually advocating for dynamic blocks in another debate last year. I'm just trying to point out that it is not all white and black.
Good to hear.