Overall, there seems to be a sense of helplessness. Some reflected on why the Chinese had so little say in the matter and some urge that the Chinese should form their own core development team and create their own fork.
If you were to form a mining developer team, do you have an idea as to what your goals would be?
It seems like you there had been miner suggestion of a third alternative, neither classic nor core, but intead mining code with 95% consensus HF for a 2mb increase, remove RBF, and segwit testing possibly a year down the road? IMO the more coders with different views writing code the better Bitcoin becomes. Competition brings innovation.
Also the above bold proposal is something I would support and hope once Bitcoin Classic code comes out is what it is or something close to it IF NOT and a chinese group came out with it I would go BitcoinChina
We can fork many times in the future when consensus does not like when a development team does something we disagree with, this is part of the Bitcoin Satoshi came up with using open source.