Personally, I find your attitude to be elitist and dogmatic.
Elitist? Interesting considering where my position in society is. Dogmatic? No (this one suits Peter R and his followers depending on what your definition here is). I'm among the people that tend to admit that they're wrong (if they truly are) here; this can not be said for many others.
I could go back and link my post of the 5 issues that you and sbbett replied to, but I have a feeling that I would be wasting my time.
You've ignored his post. Those 5 "issues" aren't fundamental flaws in the design. I don't see something that one can directly reply to. The only two points that somewhat make sense right now are 'routing' and 'recipients being online'. The article is based on uncertainty and not technicalities.
Its like arguing with a goldfish.
Then stop arguing with yourself.