Quote from: cryptosmoker on January 30, 2016, 07:00:36 PM

Quote from: Xiaoxiao on January 22, 2016, 07:35:41 PM

Quote from: DarkDays on January 22, 2016, 03:45:11 AM

Quote from: Xiaoxiao on January 22, 2016, 02:40:42 AM

You're welcome to use this thread as a platform to voice your displeasure. However a lot of your assumptions and claims are based on misunderstandings. For example, did you know that Table Starter rakeback isn't the only way players were receiving greater than 100% rakeback? So that is why I mentioned deducting from players' accounts because of the increase in rake. Anyway, I am done partaking in this discussion. This isn't the 1st time you've tried belittling me and educating me on something I probably know much more about than you.

So you aren't going to answer any claim I make because I said boo-boo naughty words? Because I'm educating you on things that you've never responded to or shown any knowledge about? Once again, you are being illogical and ignoring everything that I'm saying.

Betcoin overraked it's players on nearly 600,000 hands. Do you agree or disagree with that statement. If you disagree: why? If you agree: what do you think they should do to compensate it's players? What are you doing, as an affiliate FOR the players, to advance their positions?

I've always bargained for the highest percentages for my players. I think my players from both the online community and IRL are more than satisfied with the services I provide. If you want I can ask them to let you know what I've done for them in the past, and it's not just paying out RB. I keep constant communication with a lot of my players via other mediums such as email or messenger.

Regarding everything else you've said. No, I totally disagree with your claims. The rake did go higher briefly but was corrected. Why did that happen? Probably miscommunication. Was it a cash grab? Absolutely not, and even if it was, it totally failed. Like I said, during the period of which it went higher, Betcoin made no monetary gains from it because of the >100% RB players, VIP, Table Starter, etc. Yes, some players received 100% rakeback (a program which has ended now) + VIP rakeback + all other promo's. So the higher the rake, the more they made.

Wow what world do you live in?

They over rake for a month, then they dont return anything and announce a rake increase. The way you see this:

Quote

The rake did go higher briefly but was corrected.

You think the more betcoin rakes the less they earn because of table starter bonus? Are you crazy person?

My favorite part is after you tell us how honest and what a great affiliate you are (that doesnt return any casino or sports earnings) you say:

Quote

Regarding everything else you've said. No, I totally disagree with your claims.

You disagree with the facts that have proof? Show some facts then please.

You misread my reply and then tried to build off of that. I didn't say Betcoin raked less because of the table starter bonus; there was ANOTHER 100% RB program which you probably didn't know about which has ended now, but you just assumed I was talking about the table starter bonus when I mentioned "100% RB program". Humility goes a long way in life kid.

It's good that you're wary and alert regarding the operation of online poker rooms. I know there's been a lot of cases of awful things happening such as the UB/Absolute incident and also Lock Poker among others, but this current debacle is almost like a witch hunt. I can assure you that the people at Betcoin were simply inexperienced with poker room management and had no ill intent when they made the error.