Spam fills blocks => a "savior" comes along and says the solution is to increase block size to fill blocks with more spam under the pretext of scaling txs => you have both a power grab and more inefficiency to deal with.
is 100x 50cent bets spam?
the idea is to have enough TX on the network so that fee's replace block subsidy.
i say, let the BMO's blockchain app spam away!
If you have ample space (let's say 10mb blocks), why would anyone pay fees to get included? It's not like there's a shortage of space... so the fee would be more like ...a tip at that point.
The only way people would pay fees is if miners started declining free or near-zero-fee txs for processing, (or fees were enforced by the protocol or something). But if that happened, you don't get to spam for near-zero cost or zero cost.
no people have and always will pay the tiny fee.
blocks were never full and everyone paid the fee.
there is a supply / demand dynamic at play with or without a block limit. miners gain nothing from including a 0fee TX, it makes there block bigger for no reason, they will do like they do now and make 0fee TX wait at 0conf for a while.