Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal!
by
Lauda
on 31/01/2016, 08:39:00 UTC
The only panic right now is because people realized Bitcoin Core main plan is basically stop possibility of further Bitcoin adoption, their roadplan is the evidence - 1.5 MB will be eaten very likely this year, but no futher increase possible till late 2017, thus no addoption posible.  Lets face it, with such roadmap Bitcoin gives its huge marketshare to altcoins clompletly for free - really no bad intentions have to be assumed from such minority vetoing the majority  Huh
The majority do not want what you want, or the majority that owns a lot of coins. Look at it whatever way you want. The roadmap is better than anything you will ever see from newbies such as found in Classic. It features increases in capacity, improvements to the infrastructure, while on the other hand Classic has nothing (aside of a stoner, a developer of mediocre skill; should I go on?).

Partnering with PwC and staying in Bitcoin Core lead development is worse for Bitcoin than Mike leaving Bitcoin and helping R3
-snip-
No, this is propaganda. Everyone stated being obsessed on how Blockstream would ROI. After they start looking into ways of doing that, they're also bad. There is no rational reason for the move away from Core, none. If you are unable to get your way then the other party is bad?