Good Morning!
I didn't say Betcoin raked less because of the table starter bonus; there was ANOTHER 100% RB program which you probably didn't know about which has ended now, but you just assumed I was talking about the table starter bonus when I mentioned "100% RB program".
I know there were some regs getting 100% rakeback for the past 10+ months, some of those accounts are now gone, but that was by no means a promotion and certainly no excuse to not return what they took from those who did not receive 100%+ rakeback.
What promotion are you talking about?
What's the point of being intentionally vague?
It's good that you're wary and alert regarding the operation of online poker rooms. I know there's been a lot of cases of awful things happening such as the UB/Absolute incident and also Lock Poker among others, but this current debacle is almost like a witch hunt. I can assure you that the people at Betcoin were simply inexperienced with poker room management and had no ill intent when they made the error.
I agree they are inexperienced, but you really don't seem to be looking at the big picture XiaoXiao. Either that or you really just dgaf, which would be fine - if it weren't for all the BS you are posting about them in this thread while choosing to "disagree"/ignore all the evidence that I've presented.
The issue is NOT that Betcoin accidentally over raked their cash games.
It's because after they realized they were over raked their cash games,
they pretended like they didn't know for a while,
they lied about it and eventually admitted to it (sort of) then refused to return the money (sort of) In the thread discussing this, they deleted the posts made by unhappy players and left those who complimented betcoin. No doubt there will be players who find the thread and have no reason to assume anything other than "problem solved everyone happy" That's just fucked up.