To clarify, you're responding to a two-part question:
1. Do you concede that there is, indeed, possible conflict of interests (Y/N)
2. [Are we now] discussing the mechanics of mitigating it? (Y/N)
There are always possible conflicts of interest (I have never stated there couldn't be).
We can discuss that provided you stop wanting Gavin to control things (so if we are arguing a solution for "both sides" then Gavin is excluded from leadership for a start).
Have I suggested that "Gavin [should be allowed to] control things? If so, could you point me to the post that led you to think so? I'd like to edit it. ty