More than sufficient?

It's very clear that you either don't understand what I have said, or you are intentionally misleading others with your responses.

After I explained how Betcoin was taking more than they should in rake for over 3 weeks and didn't refund, you commented:


So "briefly" = almost a month?

"corrected" = increasing the rake, without refunding anyone?

Why do you think Betcoin did not profit from over raking players? (Table Starter + Promos + VIP etc.. is not an answer without some educated guesses and math)

Please answer Dooglus' quesion, and also how you feel about Betcoin refusing to answer and deleting it:



During the Over Rake period, how many players do you think receive over 100% rakeback, on average, at a Betcoin Cash table with 5 or more players. (My guess is 1.2 players.)

Can you disprove any of the following?  Do you think any of it is not true, even if you can't prove it?

•  They first knew they were over charging players no later Novermber 14th
•  They didn't even aknowledge the issue untill I made THIS POST on December 9th.
  
  
•  Before eventually admitting the fact that they were taking more than they should, they denied it.
  Quote
  The rake is actually programmed correctly in the system with the proper cap but appears to be capping at 2 ($0.82) for most tables 5 ($2.14) for some tables and the highest of 8 mbtc ($3.43) for very few tables.
  
  
•   Players asked about refunds.  They have yet to provide a direct answer, but implied that they would be keeping all of it because most players were receiving more than they should:
  Quote
  Refunding players who have been overpaying is a bit more complicated because most players are actually getting more than they should!
   
  
  
•  All responses to this statement have been ignored.  All (or most) have been deleted.  
•  From 11/14 - 12/9 over 588,000 hands were dealt at Betcoin
•  There is evidence of the cap being too high on 11/14, 12/9 and many days in between.  There is no evidence of the cap being correct at any time during this period.
•  Due to the table starter promotion, at any given time, no more than two players per table are receiving over 100% rakeback.  (note: XiaoXiao has now mentioned a mysterious other promotion involving other players collecting 100% plus, but hasn't clarified")
•  Heads up cash tables are not eligible for tablestarter promotion.
•  Example:  The rake should have never been more than 2.5% with a max of 2 chips per hand at the following table and we see 6 being taken.  A maximum of 2 are getting 100%+ rakeback, possibly 1 or 0.   So a MINIMUM of 4 out of every 6 pots larger than 80 chips results in Betcoin taking funds they aren't entitled to.

•  Example: High stakes Heads Up Match.  The rake should be capped at 1 chip but they take 5 chips.   Because of the stakes, every time they see a flop - Betcoin took 4 more chips than they should have.  It may not seem like much, but consider they played a 200 hand session (less than an hour) and saw 70% of flops.  Betcoin would have ended up with over 500 chips that would simply be unethical to keep.