Then you don't understand how the actual fiat system works.
btw 25% =/= almost 1/3. It equals 1/4.
There was a mistake in my original statement and miscalculation. 25% of the initial network is more than 30% of the forked network. You're the one who doesn't understand the current system that we're living in. Stop trying to make Bitcoin a democracy. It should be trustless, not a battle between chains.
Still it means 3 times more hashpower on the new chain.
And bitcoin no democracy... then there should nothing at all happen. Though the facts are that all forks are a form of democracy. I wonder how you imagine how things should be solved otherwise. We will never reach a consensus after this long time so the solution would be to do nothing? Or simply doing what you want?
I don't see why it is fine for you to run a softfork that activates after 75% of the hashpower is using it or a hard fork that goes life after similar thresholds. Double standards? It would still show that the majority supports something.
Really, i wonder what you are against for.