Worse still 25% of the initial network is 100% of the other forked network!
100% of small blockers! This is patently unfair, the 100% not being allowed to* carry on mining small blocks.
(*by not being allowed to, I mean "being allowed to but it's just not fair")
Depending on the time that the fork would occur (between difficulty adjustments) you could say that they aren't allowed to. The chain becomes rendered useless for a longer time because of the other majority. It is clear that we can't get everyone on board on a single proposal (and thus 100% consensus is impossible), but nobody sane would recommend a split. Essentially the people behind the fork do not care much about the whole industry and especially not about the users, they just want to take over.