Also, the post in question discusses ecosystems and ecosystem services. However, it's noted that the brunt of your argument is in discussing the syntactical and semantic use of a single term, as it's the only counter-argument you can come up with. Also, did I not provide three terms for you at the end of the post? Don't let your lack of understanding cause you to stick to a weak argument.
You mean trophic cascades, ecosystem services, and island biogeography? How much does each of those cost?
Your remarks simply are not demonstrating any level of comprehension on your part. The three terms in question would be (as already mentioned) a great starting point for you to better understand these concepts. Instead of going down the nonsensical path of trying to sound like you can intelligently debate this, just go read a few books on the subject.