Now the Transform PR proposal is voted down again, the voters have spoken. So obviously I am doing something right here, no?
I think Transform PR was doing a fantastic job and I would like to work with them again, however it's not really possible to do it when the network can flip-flop back and forth. We've now funded them, unfunded them, funded them again, then finally unfunded them. I would recommend the network vote down this proposal due to the completely crazy and unprofessional way this makes our operation look. How can we possibly work with a company like Transform, with 3-month minimums when our network has the ability to do a complete backflip, essentially voiding a contract?
I think it's best we wait until 12.1 when we can do irrevocable contracts like I laid out earlier.
Not so sure we want irrevocable contracts though... atleast not just yet, the budget is way to small for large contracts like this.
Maybe you should do some investigation as to WHY the proposal was voted down? Maybe there is a solution thats glaring you in the face and you just refuse to see it?
Let the network vote. Don't just force contracts onto the network please, we all know everytime you put something up for proposal it passes right awya until people talk about it a bit and see the details of whats happening. Just like the PR company issue we are facing right now.
As I said in (the new) slack just now:
thedashguy [12:45 PM]
I'm not sure we should be jumping the gun on this stuff.
We need to first solve the process in which proposals are submitted and talked about
We cant have so much back and forth AFTERwards
Creates situations like this.
i agree with the sentiment,
if the network makes a commitment we should keep it
(thats what they mean about me "spamming" btw.)