I have been so done with the block fight I don't even know what segwit is and why it can't work with 2mb blocks, if it can then why not both?
As I understand it, SegWit and increased blocksizes are two completely separate issues. SegWit improves efficiency, and is the equivalent of a 2Mb blocksize, or better. It introduces a number of other possibilities as well. As there is no immediate need for a blocksize increase, it would be better to implement SegWit, and then see what is needed for the future. Who knows, maybe the Litecoin and Bitcoin chains should be combined to facilitate exchanges.

An irrational fear of hard forking to 2MB is not valid justification for Blockstream's paid/owned core devs to ignore the wider community and strap on their experimental protocol-perverting sidechain.
Fact: Satoshi reduced the blocksize to an arbitrary 1MB as a
temporary security measure only. It was never intended to stay fixed at 1MB and certainly
never intended as a consensus rule. What we are seeing is a 'classic' example of a hostile corporate takeover having fully co-opted command and control of bitcoin core.