Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal!
by
Lauda
on 04/02/2016, 18:27:19 UTC
Core completes a years long development work which speeds signature validation >5x, invents a clean way to allow new efficiencies and security trade-offs, gets node pruning working, and comes up with a way to get roughly 2MB worth of capacity without a the risky and coordination problematic hardfork, while simultaneously fixing some long time bugs like malleability and misaligned incentives (utxo bloat).
The work Core has done is good, besides certain details within the code discounting some transaction types in favor of lighting network developed by Blockstream. It being open source I am sure it can be adapted and adopted into another client which will scale Bitcoin to its true potential.
This is what you label as 'good'? You obviously don't even have the slightest clue as far as the complexity is concerned. Another thing that you're wrong about is "LN developed by Blockstream". There are multiple implementations of the Lightning Network, the most advanced ones are:
Joseph, Tadge and roasbeef's version: https://github.com/LightningNetwork/lnd/  
Rusty'sversion (Blockstream): https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning

The only way to "prove", "community support" is through proof of work. The moment of truth is approaching.
Power to the people! Grin
Look at all the support for the 'forkers':
Quote