No one knows the correct balance or the amount of change that effectively tips the scales, but it seems likely that the current migration is too much, too fast and there is bound to be a massive amount of friction. The crux of my point is that this flood of people did not happen in isolation; it comes as a result of sustained, decades long, conflict in the region (physical, geopolitical and economic). Do you agree?
Yes, but it is not only due geo-political conflict but the root problem is socialism. I am all for the free movement of people without passports and borders, but not when the government will offer free welfare to every migrant (USA has this problem also, except luckily the Latinos are reasonably hard working).
If the migrants weren't coddled by the State, they wouldn't have the incentive to invade. If the people had the right to bear arms and privately funded security forces (not provided by the State), the migrants wouldn't misbehave.
But it goes much deeper than that. Include the Western governments propping up puppet regimes in the Middle East which created all kinds of imbalances.
Note the position of (most of) the Middle East countries on this chart (the corrupt State powers-that-be have been propping up failure with winks and handshakes):
Excellent and I like how he speaks very quickly so I don't get bored. The chart at 20:20 is amazing. The Middle East
and Australia need to tumble economically.
[...]
Readers make sure you view
the aforementioned chart (in the video at 20:20, not the chart below), as it explains why India and China will rise after 2020 and lead the world. Hildago's academic research validates Martin Armstrong's long-standing prediction about this and MA's famous chart:
[...]