Many people are more interested in bitcoin-the-blockchain-technology than Bitcoin-the-first-crypto-currency.
I'm sorry, but I have no way of interpreting that statement that doesn't involve you being an idiot.
There is no such thing as bitcoin-the-blockchain. The fact that you can even begin to conceive that this may be a thing makes me very certain that you are shit out of arguments in this debate.
Blockchain - anyone can create: can use it to support currency, dns, registries, etc.
Bitcoin - is a digital currency that employs blockchain rules.
Trying to paint bitcoin as some tech-for-hire is a new low - even for you.
Bitcoin's blockchain exists. You may download it
here.
You don't need to hold Bitcoins to use Bitcoin's blockchain; you only must spend enough to use the blockchain as an immutable ledger (ie, it's tech for hire).
Soon we will have Layer 2 things built on the blockchain's Layer 1, like sidechains and payment channels, which abstract, standardize, and (hopefully) commodify/commercialize/professionalize those processes.
Accounting firms like PwC are very excited to use bitcoin-the-blockchain's technology and infrastructure to do their jobs better, but crypto-currency speculation is beyond their remit.
You really are adorable.
You have conned $76m from those poor trusting, hard working VC's and investment types for something they could have downloaded for free via the link you posted? Nice work!
So whats in the blockchain that they are interested in? Isn't it just full of transactions of bitcoins? ( that they are not interested in)
Come on, that was a very weak effort. You will need to invent a better story about your
concept....