what do you think it is? i see so much of this insinuation that he (and others) have these nefarious intentions, but it seems no one can spell out what they are, and how it's going to work. just how is Blockstream causing such massive conflicts of interest? where does the money come in? the VC numbers i've heard thrown around are tiny and meaningless. what exactly about Blockstream is it -- specifically -- that has made people turn so vociferously on Core devs that have tirelessly worked for years to make bitcoin what it is?
Amount of money lost if Gavin Andresen receives rejected proposals =
-$Amount of money lost if Gregory Maxwell receives rejected proposals =
-$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Who sounds like they have more to lose?
Who sounds like the genuine person now?
what proof do you have that Gavin Andresen isn't being paid to promote his fork? he is under no obligations (other than moral ones) to disclose to the community whose payroll he is on. why do you just assume that he is just some altruistic hero, when all he has done for the past year is try to take control of bitcoin's repository via two hard forks?
i think it's quite suspicious that Gavin said 2mb was "absurdly small" when attempting previously to remove Core's commit access with his XT fork.... and NOW is pushing for a 2mb hard fork to remove Core's commit access. never mind that Seg Wit nearly matches the capacity increase -- or better...
what proof do you have that "money is being lost if Gregory Maxwell receives rejected proposals?" what money? what is the business plan? what is the conflict of interest? spell it out for me, please.