Hmm, if jumping up from 1MB to 2MB is controversial then perhaps we should try incrementing to 1.1MB or something just to get our feet wet. If we like it then we can try 1.2MB and so on. Waiting until the backlog is huge is not wise. The tension between full blocks = higher fees and barriers to adoption is certainly interesting. Personally I think we should favor adoption for now and defer cranking up fees until a little later.
I like that. Anyone have thoughts?
It would not be bad; we'd get some experience with HF's. An increase of 100 KB every X amount of blocks until we reach 2 MB.
Surprisingly, you agree with an increase of block size, then why so critic about Classic. I think the purpose of Classic is just to bump the block size a little bit and practice hard fork, because with a hard fork, even segwit can be implemented more neatly