No. As I pointed out above several times, the JINN and IOTA business propositions are blatant lies. I explained why that is the case. Yes, they are perfect vehicles to roll out a P&D scam by misleading the uninformed and greedy crowd that there is a business case, but I have pointed out why it is not possible to implement such businesses without adequate academic background, R&D capability, experience, infrastructure, resources and market. Don't forget, in the case of IoT they don't even have the market. In the corporate driven IoT market nobody touch a "quantum resistant alternative crypto currency". I understand they can sell to the idiots this nonsense, but go and ask an IoT VC or angel investor they will tell you what they think about such nonsense like monetizing a "quantum resistant alternative crypto currency" in IoT.


I understand he is smart enough to roll out scams and create code for a scam, but I agree with CIYAM he is not a such exceptional good software engineer. Good enough to produce code for a P&D. Nothing more.
Someone PM-d me here his few java files. (Btw that is IOTA, his few java files). There are no comments nor basic error and exception handling. In a code review of a graduate software engineer, before even looking at the implementation details it would be told the software developer, please go and just first comply with the very basic software engineering principles like comment your code and think about error and exception handling, and then we will continue to code review. (I am 99% positive he never ever had a formal code review in his carrier). Now, this genius software developer present such code in a public domain. Indicates lack of experience and professional pride. As I said, he knows it I doesn't matter what kind of source code he presents. The "investors" (his shills and sockpuppets of this thread) couldn't give a monkey about the quality of code, they care about only the P&D and the "ROI".