Spartacus17 stated he wanted to do a rep. loan and was given the appropriate feedback.
2 posters BEFORE you went through with the loan warned you about rep. loans, you did it anyway so you will have to deal with the feedback.
However, he got hit with thousands of negative trusts, and I did too.
Care to show us these "thousands of Negatives"?
It was embellishment to prove a point. That people can just throw negatives at people without a second's thought.
BTW, I didn't get to read those before I did it.
YOU screwed the pooch after being warned, own your mistake.
And I have, and I have apologized, this all happened months ago.
Can't you be at all lenient?
I apologized, owning up to the mistake.
No need to keep the negative on my account.
Most of your OP is worded to incur sympathy by "embellishing" truth and leaving out other information. You have shown no true remorse only flaming those that left you deserved feedback; a typical pity tactic. Now, months later, you suddenly care about those very feedbacks, why is this?
To roll it in a nutshell: Anyone that "apologizes" for past transgressions, no matter how big or small, should be given a clean slate?
Nothing is embellished besides that one comment.
I care about these feedbacks, as I was off due to IRL stuff, and now I want to get re-established back into the community, and don't need negatives on my wall.
I have shown remorse, I really don't know how you show true remorse for something I was not knowledgeable about at the time of the action.
Is that last statement-question a rhetorical?
I never said anyone and everyone should get a clean slate no matter the 'crime'.
I did state however that this all occurred, due to a lack of knowledge on my part, and that I understand and apologize for my actions during that transgression.
Also, that due to the time of the event, and the fact that I own up, and acknowledge that my actions were at fault during that time, that I should get a second chance.