...
Or take a car for example. The car is complex. But the people who made it are way more complex.
There are so extremely many of examples of less complexity coming from greater complexity, and no examples of greater complexity coming from lesser complexity, that this is a law of the universe... at least until someone proves it wrong. They need to start by finding even one example.
...
Or take a car for example. The car is complex. But the people who made it are way more complex.
There are so extremely many of examples of less complexity coming from greater complexity, and no examples of greater complexity coming from lesser complexity, that this is a law of the universe... at least until someone proves it wrong. They need to start by finding even one example.
...
That is why paying attention in biology class pays off.
I have two questions for you:
Do you know we are mammals? yes or no, please?
Do you know that we have a common ancestor with chimpanzees? yes or no, please?
I'm assuming you acknowledge the evolution since you are claiming God programmed it.
If you accept that live evolves from simpler live forms, you accept that life becomes more complex over time.
These are not necessarily yes or no questions.
We are considered mammalian by many.
Nobody has scientific proof that we have common ancestry with chimpanzees.
Life changes in some ways. The definition of evolve or evolution has only been assumed so far, but has not been given.
No proof? LOL! The Wikipedia article is 25+ pages long, citing 192 different sources... not much proof there...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent
Read my lips. Theory of evolution. Not fact of evolution. Anybody can edit Wikipedia to say whatever he wants.
