-snip-
...the fact that Classic is DOA with the mining and economic majority opposing them. Cheers friend.

-snip-
You read the letter as a resounding denunciation of Classic and a firm endorsement of Core, interesting.
Upon reading point 3...
In the next 3 weeks, we need the Bitcoin Core developers to work with us and clarify the roadmap with respect to a future hard-fork which includes an increase of the block size.
This is obviously asking Core to do what they have refused to do for a year now, and it gives a deadline.
Let's see if miners will grab the bone they might be thrown. My guess is that it will be a pinky promise for a HF sometime in 2017.
Now, because Core is immune to politics, and will only base decisions on their
enabling of future profitability technical superiority... they simply cannot do this. To change Gregory's roadmap is to succumb to political pressure where a mouth breathing majority tramples the sacred rights of the enlightened minority, compromising
at all would mean they have been lying all along about that point. Bit of a pickle there. Cheers Friend.

Let the purge begin! Bitcoin is a settlement tool for central banking, excelsior!
Any tips on how I can run a payment channel hub to siphon fees from miners?The sooner we purge these CIA/
GCHQ banksters, the better! Zionists... ur next!

This sinister sounding abbreviation keeps popping up.
BlindMayorBitcorn, I can't help but observe that flooding a thread with tripe-- as you appear to be doing-- when it isn't going your way is literally straight out of the GCHQ public communication subversion playbook.
I really ought to know what this is I'm a part of.